Analyses the deck of a box-girder bridge as a continuous beam: any number of spans and cantilevers, haunched segments, settlements, elastic supports and hinges, with the variable loads in their worst arrangement. Every step shows its formula.
What it checks
- The system: the deck is a chain of segments between numbered points, one at every support, hinge and change of section. The degree of indeterminacy is r − (2 + h), with r the reactions, springs included, and h the hinges. In an indeterminate deck, settlements produce forces.
- The loads: the total as entered ΣF, its resultant at xF, and ΣFvar for the loads in the worst arrangement.
- The worst arrangement: each piece of a variable load, segment by segment, may be present or absent. With k pieces, all Narr = 2ᵏ arrangements are covered with k + 1 analyses, and the results become an envelope.
- Support reactions: R from the loads as entered, Rmax and Rmin, and the equilibrium check ΣR = ΣF.
- At every point: Mmax and Mmin, the shear on each side (Vmax,l, Vmin,l, Vmax,r, Vmin,r) and the deflections wmax and wmin.
- In each segment: the largest sagging and hogging moments with their positions, the largest shear force, the largest deflection, the largest deflection relative to the supports wrel and l/|wrel|.
- Deflection check, optional: |wrel| ≤ l/nlim for every segment.
- Chosen sections, up to four: the moment, the shear on each side, the deflection and the rotation, with the envelope.
What you enter and what you get
You enter the number of segments, the modulus E, and for each segment its length and its second moment of area, constant or with straight or parabolic haunches at either end. At each point you choose the support (pinned or roller, fixed, free, guided up and down, guided left and right, or elastic with a vertical and a rotational spring), its settlement and whether the deck is continuous or hinged. Then up to eight distributed loads, uniform or trapezoidal, up to eight concentrated forces and up to four concentrated moments, each as entered or in the worst arrangement, the deflection limit and the chosen sections.
You get the diagrams and every result above, with a pass or fail for each deflection check.
Assumptions and limits
- A straight beam with no axial force. E is the same along the whole length.
- In a haunch the width is taken as constant, so I grows with the cube of the depth.
- The analysis is linear: enter characteristic or design values as you need them. Forces downward and moments clockwise are positive.
- A force in the worst arrangement is present or absent at the position you enter; it is not moved along the deck.
- Settlements are included with the loads as entered.
- The deflection of a segment is measured from the line through its supported ends: a settlement moves that line, it does not bend the segment.
Worked example
A beam of four segments, 6.0 m, 7.5 m with parabolic haunches of 1.5 m at both ends, 6.0 m and a cantilever of 1.8 m, with E = 32,000 N/mm², a settlement of 5 mm at point 2, 22 kN/m as entered and 12 kN/m in the worst arrangement over the whole length, 40 kN at the end of the cantilever, and a limit of l/300. These are the module's own results for its worked example, computed when this page was built.
Inputs| Input | Value | Ref. |
|---|
| Number of segments n | 4 | |
|---|
| Modulus of elasticity E | 32000 N/mm² | |
|---|
| Length l1 | 6.0 m | |
|---|
| Second moment of area I1 | 5400 10⁶ mm⁴ | |
|---|
| Section along the segment | Constant | |
|---|
| Length l2 | 7.5 m | |
|---|
| Second moment of area I2 | 5400 10⁶ mm⁴ | |
|---|
| Section along the segment | Parabolic haunches | |
|---|
| Length of the haunch at the left end aA,2 | 1.5 m | |
|---|
| Second moment of area at the left end IA,2 | 10800 10⁶ mm⁴ | |
|---|
| Length of the haunch at the right end aB,2 | 1.5 m | |
|---|
| Second moment of area at the right end IB,2 | 10800 10⁶ mm⁴ | |
|---|
| Length l3 | 6.0 m | |
|---|
| Second moment of area I3 | 5400 10⁶ mm⁴ | |
|---|
| Section along the segment | Constant | |
|---|
| Length l4 | 1.8 m | |
|---|
| Second moment of area I4 | 5400 10⁶ mm⁴ | |
|---|
| Section along the segment | Constant | |
|---|
| Support | Pinned | |
|---|
| Settlement of the support Δ0 | 0 mm | |
|---|
| Support | Roller | |
|---|
| Settlement of the support Δ1 | 0 mm | |
|---|
| Joint | Continuous | |
|---|
| Support | Roller | |
|---|
| Settlement of the support Δ2 | 5 mm | |
|---|
| Joint | Continuous | |
|---|
| Support | Roller | |
|---|
| Settlement of the support Δ3 | 0 mm | |
|---|
| Joint | Continuous | |
|---|
| Support | Free | |
|---|
| Number of distributed loads | 2 | |
|---|
| Start xa,1 | 0 m | |
|---|
| End xb,1 | 21.3 m | |
|---|
| Intensity at the start qa,1 | 22 kN/m | |
|---|
| Intensity at the end qb,1 | 22 kN/m | |
|---|
| Arrangement | As entered | |
|---|
| Start xa,2 | 0 m | |
|---|
| End xb,2 | 21.3 m | |
|---|
| Intensity at the start qa,2 | 12 kN/m | |
|---|
| Intensity at the end qb,2 | 12 kN/m | |
|---|
| Arrangement | Worst case | |
|---|
| Number of concentrated forces | 1 | |
|---|
| Position xP,1 | 21.3 m | |
|---|
| Force (downward positive) P1 | 40 kN | |
|---|
| Arrangement | As entered | |
|---|
| Number of concentrated moments | 0 | |
|---|
| Check the deflections against a limit | Yes | |
|---|
| Limit: the segment length divided by nlim | 300 | |
|---|
| Number of sections for their own results | 1 | |
|---|
| Position of section 1 xS1 | 9.75 m | |
|---|
Calculation: The beam| Step | Value | Ref. |
|---|
| Length of the beamΣ li | ltot = 21.30 m | |
|---|
| Reactions against equations of equilibriumr = 5 reactions (4 vertical and rotational, springs included; 1 horizontal); 3 equations of equilibrium + 1 for each of the h = 0 hingesstatically indeterminate, degree 2; for bending, degree 2: the moments depend on the stiffness, and settlements produce forces | r − (3 + h) = 2 | |
|---|
| Step | 1Segment 10.00 → 6.00 m | 2Segment 26.00 → 13.50 m | 3Segment 313.50 → 19.50 m | 4Segment 419.50 → 21.30 m | Ref. |
|---|
| Length l m | 6.00 | 7.50 | 6.00 | 1.80 | |
|---|
| Bending stiffness E·I MN·m²E·I between the haunches | 172.8 | 172.8 | 172.8 | 172.8 | |
|---|
| Bending stiffness at the left end E·IA MN·m² | · | 345.6 | · | · | |
|---|
| Bending stiffness at the right end E·IB MN·m² | · | 345.6 | · | · | |
|---|
| Haunch shape | · | parabolic | · | · | |
|---|
Calculation: The loads| Step | Value | Ref. |
|---|
| Total load as enteredΣ (qa + qb)/2·(xb − xa) + Σ Pdownward positive; the loads placed in the worst arrangement are not included | ΣF = 508.6 kN | |
|---|
| Position of its resultantΣ F·x / ΣF | xF = 11.49 m | |
|---|
| Loads in the worst arrangement, all presentdistributed loads present or absent segment by segment, forces and moments present or absent | ΣFvar = 255.6 kN | |
|---|
Calculation: The worst arrangement| Step | Value | Ref. |
|---|
| Load pieces that may each be present or absentload 2 on segment 1, load 2 on segment 2, load 2 on segment 3, load 2 on segment 4 | k = 4 | |
|---|
| Arrangements coveredNarr = 2ᵏ; max = base + Σ (positive contributions), min = base + Σ (negative contributions)the analysis is linear: each piece is analysed once, and at every section the pieces that increase the value are added for the largest result, those that decrease it for the smallest; this is the same as analysing all 2^k combinations, with only k + 1 analyses | Narr = 16 | |
|---|
Calculation: Support reactions| Step | Value | Ref. |
|---|
| Equilibrium: sum of the vertical reactionsequals ΣF of the loads as entereda check of the analysis: the reactions balance the loads | ΣR = 508.60 kN | |
|---|
| Step | 0Point 0pinned | 1Point 1roller | 2Point 2roller | 3Point 3roller | Ref. |
|---|
| Vertical reaction, from the loads as entered R kNupward positive | 38.92 | 196.92 | 109.63 | 163.13 | |
|---|
| Largest vertical reaction Rmax kN | 71.62 | 294.73 | 206.35 | 221.50 | |
|---|
| Smallest vertical reaction Rmin kN | 32.38 | 190.80 | 98.58 | 156.84 | |
|---|
Calculation: At the points| Step | 0Point 0x = 0.00 m | 1Point 1x = 6.00 m | 2Point 2x = 13.50 m | 3Point 3x = 19.50 m | 4Point 4x = 21.30 m | Ref. |
|---|
| Largest bending moment Mmax kN·msagging positive | 0.0 | -154.5 | 10.6 | -107.6 | 0.0 | |
|---|
| Smallest bending moment Mmin kN·m | 0.0 | -229.5 | -68.1 | -127.1 | 0.0 | |
|---|
| Largest shear force, left of the point Vmax,l kN | · | -91.7 | -55.5 | -77.2 | 40.0 | |
|---|
| Smallest shear force, left of the point Vmin,l kN | · | -140.3 | -110.9 | -120.3 | 40.0 | |
|---|
| Largest shear force, right of the point Vmax,r kN | 71.6 | 154.5 | 95.4 | 101.2 | · | |
|---|
| Smallest shear force, right of the point Vmin,r kN | 32.4 | 99.1 | 43.1 | 79.6 | · | |
|---|
| Largest deflection wmax mmdownward positive | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 0.16 | |
|---|
| Smallest deflection wmin mm | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 0.00 | -1.60 | |
|---|
Calculation: In each segment| Step | 1Segment 10.00 → 6.00 m | 2Segment 26.00 → 13.50 m | 3Segment 313.50 → 19.50 m | 4Segment 419.50 → 21.30 m | Ref. |
|---|
| Largest sagging moment Mmax kN·m | 75.4 | 127.9 | 91.0 | · | |
|---|
| its position x m | 2.10 | 10.41 | 16.05 | · | |
|---|
| Largest hogging moment Mmin kN·m | -229.5 | -229.5 | -127.1 | -127.1 | |
|---|
| its position x m | 6.00 | 6.00 | 19.50 | 19.50 | |
|---|
| Largest shear force |V|max kN | 140.3 | 154.5 | 120.3 | 101.2 | |
|---|
| Largest deflection wmax mmdownward positive, largest in magnitude | 1.04 | 6.45 | 5.05 | -1.60 | |
|---|
| its position x m | 2.33 | 11.06 | 14.40 | 21.30 | |
|---|
| Largest deflection relative to the supports wrel mmfrom the line through the supported ends; a cantilever: from its support | 1.04 | 3.38 | 1.64 | -1.60 | |
|---|
| its position x m | 2.33 | 10.13 | 16.28 | 21.30 | |
|---|
| Relative deflection over the length l/|wrel| | 5,792 | 2,221 | 3,651 | 1,128 | |
|---|
Calculation: Check — deflection of every segment| Step | Value | Ref. |
|---|
| Deflection of segment 1|wrel|max,1 ≤ l1/nlim | η = 0.052 · Pass5 % of the capacity used | |
|---|
| Deflection of segment 2|wrel|max,2 ≤ l2/nlim | η = 0.135 · Pass14 % of the capacity used | |
|---|
| Deflection of segment 3|wrel|max,3 ≤ l3/nlim | η = 0.082 · Pass8 % of the capacity used | |
|---|
| Deflection of segment 4|wrel|max,4 ≤ l4/nlim | η = 0.266 · Pass27 % of the capacity used | |
|---|
Calculation: At the chosen sections| Step | 1Section 1x = 9.75 m | Ref. |
|---|
| Largest bending moment Mmax kN·msagging positive | 120.6 | |
|---|
| Smallest bending moment Mmin kN·m | 52.4 | |
|---|
| Largest shear force, left of the section Vmax,l kN | 27.0 | |
|---|
| Smallest shear force, left of the section Vmin,l kN | 16.6 | |
|---|
| Largest shear force, right of the section Vmax,r kN | 27.0 | |
|---|
| Smallest shear force, right of the section Vmin,r kN | 16.6 | |
|---|
| Largest deflection wmax mmdownward positive | 5.82 | |
|---|
| Smallest deflection wmin mm | 3.62 | |
|---|
| Largest rotation θmax mradanticlockwise positive | -0.882 | |
|---|
| Smallest rotation θmin mrad | -1.017 | |
|---|
How this module is verified
Verified against independent calculations used on real projects, before release.
Questions
How is the traffic placed on the spans?
Enter it as a load in the worst arrangement. It is then present or absent on each segment it covers, and the results become the envelope over all the arrangements.
Why does a settlement of a support change the moments?
A continuous deck is statically indeterminate: a support that settles relative to the others bends it. In the worked example the degree is 2 and point 2 settles 5 mm.
Can I print the calculation?
The full calculation is shown on screen, free and without an account. A print-ready A4 calculation note is part of the Basic plan.
Related
Page updated: 8 November 2026